and spam cop is even worse, isps subscribe to them and you don't even have a choice of the mail you recieve. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alex Snow" <alex_snow@xxxxxxx> To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup at braille.uwo.ca> Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 6:18 PM Subject: Re: Fwd: Verification required for dannyboy at paonline.com,protected by 0Spam.com. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 it seems like these systems are becoming more common...they seem to be taking the wrong aproach: letting a central company protect them instead of setting up their own software. or blocking all msgs and asking you to verify instead of blocking the spam. waist of bandwidth. On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 05:00:44PM -0500, Thomas Stivers wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > While I understand people wanting to prevent spam be sure you don't send spam yourself with a challenge response system that isn't set up corectly. I got 3 of these today and as long as Greg saw the message I sent earlier I don't care if others miss it because I didn't verify. > > - ----- Forwarded message from verify at 0spam.com ----- > > From: verify at 0spam.com > Subject: Verification required for dannyboy at paonline.com, protected by 0Spam.com. > > ATTENTION! > A message you recently sent to a 0Spam.com user with the subject "Re: ip over ip tunneling" was not delivered because they are using the 0Spam.com anti-spam service. Please click the link below to confirm that this is not spam. When you confirm, this message and all future messages you send will automatically be accepted. > > http://www.0spam.com/verify.cgi?user=1093257344&verify=234119 > > > ======================================== > This is an automated message from 0Spam.com. > Please do not reply to this Email. > > Looking for a free anti-spam service? > Visit us at http://www.0spam.com to find out more. > > > - ----- End forwarded message ----- > > - -- > "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. > Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, > by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan > > Thomas Stivers e-mail: stivers_t at tomass.dyndns.org > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFBGpcM5JK61UXLur0RAr83AKCCYssTuV2yWLY8ujSdHsVHqOIEIQCfezKs > DXA+ltIIbkYjTOXSlezMobo= > =sodh > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup - -- But what can you do with it? -- ubiquitous cry from Linux-user partner -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBGps+9XVrM3ri110RAhXcAJsE1xqf0En7KK3i+8X9oWhlfjNE6wCcD3r7 +n1Su3WBQPKkVsQxPBKHBlk= =+wcv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Speakup mailing list Speakup at braille.uwo.ca http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
