The hideous Dectalk 5.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

the dtc01. mine has version 2.0 of the firmware dated jul/84.
Unfortunately you cant take advantage of it's phone capabilities 
unless you have access to something like an alpha or vax running vms, 
as that's the only OS I've found complete libraries for.
On Sun, Aug 08, 
2004 at 10:37:53AM -0400, Jayson Smith wrote:
> By 'original' do you mean version 4.2 or the old, old DTC01?
> I've never seen one of those!
> Jayson.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alex Snow" <alex_snow at gmx.net>
> To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 10:02 AM
> Subject: Re: The hideous Dectalk 5.0
> 
> 
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > there's still nothing that sounds as good as the original
> > dectalk...and I got mine for the same price you'd pay for the
> > software.
> > On
> > Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 09:12:43AM +1000, Luke Yelavich wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 05:18:14AM EST, Adam Myrow wrote:
> > > > Is it just me, or is the Dectalk software 5.0 the worst-sounding
> software
> > > > synthesizer ever produced?  I think between Fonix and Force Computing,
> > > > they've absolutely ruined the Dectalk.  This thing sounds like it's
> got
> > > > tape over its mouth, and 4.61 sounded like it was intoxicated.  Not
> only
> > > > that, the installer bombs out with an "unexpected end-of-file" error.
> It
> > > > still seems to work, however.  I urge anybody who is considering this
> > > > product to think again!  I'd rather listen to Flite's monotonous
> voice.
> > > > At least it's clear.  It's not worth $50.  It isn't worth $0.01!  When
> I
> > > > pay for software, I expect quality.  I hope the USB Dectalk that
> everybody
> > > > talks about won't sound like this.
> > >
> > > On the other hand, DECtalk 5 is much more responsive than 4.61 was, so
> on that
> > > note, I would rather use 5. However I do agree that it certainly is not
> the
> > > best sounding DECtalk I have heard.
> > >
> > > Luke
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Speakup mailing list
> > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
> > - --
> > If the future navigation system [for interactive networked services on
> > the NII] looks like something from Microsoft, it will never work.
> > -- Chairman of Walt Disney Television & Telecommunications
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
> >
> > iD8DBQFBFjJx9XVrM3ri110RAtg9AJ49xK4dU4KxD+5c/8dY+dpxD69QLwCfQQaZ
> > gggtFNqd7lRrruoyQm6lvhs=
> > =PRiD
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup

- -- 
The most important design issue... is the fact that Linux is supposed to 
be fun...
	-- Linus Torvalds at the First Dutch International Symposium on Linux
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBF3rQ9XVrM3ri110RAhbSAJ450Skl9UorPFpORtqWTU+dYgsVXgCcC981
avSLvduDWz15b+clobdCSKc=
=18ci
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




[Index of Archives]     [Linux for the Blind]     [Fedora Discussioin]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]
  Powered by Linux