Not at all. I have 2.4.22 on all four of my machines -- on my Thinkpad T30 and old office Pentium 3/350 over the Speakup Modified Fedora Core 1.0, and on an old Pentium 2/200 and on a DEC Alphastation AS200 both running Debian Woody. I'm having no problems. I will say that the art of configuring a successful kernel compilation has become considerably more complex than it was a year or two ago. It has taken me multiple attempts to build a kernel that compiles and works properly. But, I don't blame the kernel for that. Complexity is the result of numerous features. It is the antithesis of simplicity for that very reason. Luke Davis writes: > From: Luke Davis <ldavis at shellworld.net> > > Does anyone else hold this opinion (that 2.4.22 is crap)? I am in the > processof compiling it on a live commercial server, and would like > opinions of this. > > Luke > On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Gregory Nowak wrote: > > > Hi all. > > > > The subject says it all. I went back to linux 2.4.21, and the box > > works like a charm. No segmentation faults, no inactivity for long > > periods, it's all gone. > > > > Thanks to all who provided suggestions/help, but in the end it turned > > out that 2.4.22 is a piece of crap. > > That's my personal opinion, which I have the right to state, so no > > flames please. > > > > Greg > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup -- Janina Sajka Email: janina at rednote.net Phone: (202) 408-8175 Director, Technology Research and Development American Foundation for the Blind (AFB) http://www.afb.org Chair, Accessibility Work Group Free Standards Group http://accessibility.freestandards.org
