jim, I agree whole heartedly.
Having said that, the fact that they only knew of red hat leaves me
somewhat perplexed.
I say go make your proffit but don't get into bed with scare mungering
exploitative greedy proprietory software makers.
My only question is, how much does freedom scientific pay to microsoft for
the use of their apis?
--
Shaun
If little else, the brain is an educational toy.
-- Tom Robbins
EMAIL: shauno at goanna.net.au
ICQ: 76958435
On Wed, 1 May 2002 jwantz at hpcc2.hpcc.noaa.gov wrote:
> Hi Janina!
> I figured this deserved a new and more appropriate thread name! I think
> the court testimony fairly reeks of self-congratutory and self-promoting
> phrases. And their obsequiousness towards M$ is nauseating! Interesting
> what Freedom Scientific had to say about Linux. They claim they are a
> business to make a profit which is fine, but yet they wouldn't hesitate to
> apply for grants at the public trough. Just a tad hypocritical don't you
> think? Thanks for the info, very enlightening.
>
> Jim Wantz
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>
