Isn't it a bit irresponsible to offer up advice for which you cannot even offer a reason? You thought it should be so? On what basis did you think this? Or, is "think" the wrong word here? On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Yvonne Smith wrote: > Janina Sajka writes: > > On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Yvonne Smith wrote: > > > If you think you'll > > > be spending most of your time in emacs, then wouldn't emacspeak perhaps > > > be a better solution than speakup? > > > > Why, for heaven's sake? Just because it has a similar name?? That would be > > silly. > > *sigh* no, that's not what I meant at all. Like I said, I'm in no > position to judge, since I've really never used emacs under speakup. I > merely thought if someone was going to spend a lot of time in emacs, > the interface that emacspeak uses might be easier to use. I didn't mean > it as a definite "you must use emacspeak" only as a "you should > possibly use emacspeak" if you were going to say spend 80% of your > computing time under emacs. > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > -- Janina Sajka, Director Technology Research and Development Governmental Relations Group American Foundation for the Blind (AFB) Email: janina at afb.net Phone: (202) 408-8175 Chair, Accessibility SIG Open Electronic Book Forum (OEBF) http://www.openebook.org
