Janina Sajka writes: > On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Yvonne Smith wrote: > > If you think you'll > > be spending most of your time in emacs, then wouldn't emacspeak perhaps > > be a better solution than speakup? > > Why, for heaven's sake? Just because it has a similar name?? That would be > silly. *sigh* no, that's not what I meant at all. Like I said, I'm in no position to judge, since I've really never used emacs under speakup. I merely thought if someone was going to spend a lot of time in emacs, the interface that emacspeak uses might be easier to use. I didn't mean it as a definite "you must use emacspeak" only as a "you should possibly use emacspeak" if you were going to say spend 80% of your computing time under emacs.
