Hi Carry. I think that mp3s are a good way to go. Wouldn't you prefer to try to sample the audio at 44100 khz? The only problem with that is that you might get some tape hiss or noise depending on the playing device you are using and the age of the tape (s). Again, you don't have to re-record the samples, but that's just my opinion on quality. Hope this helps. ----- Original Message ----- From: Kerry Hoath <kerry@xxxxxxxxx> To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca> Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 1:20 AM Subject: oggenc weirdness > Since we're all talking about anything and everything at the moment, here's > one for the list to think on: > I am currently sampling some 4-track material I own to keep it > safe in case the tapes age or snap. > I get the wav files as I want them; (I can summarize to the list if > anyone cares with the scripts I wrote yesterday to make it all work) > and these aren't Jim's scripts, I wrote these ones with comments to aid > in maintainance. > I have a .wav file 22050 samples per second 16-bit little endian mono. > I try to oggenc this file with the following command: > oggenc -b32 side01.wav > and get a message that "mode initialization failed" > This used to work fine in 1.0rc2 but appears to have broken in 1.0rc3 > Anyone else running 1.0rc3 and seen this behaviour? > If I don't specify -b32 I get an encoded file which averages 51kb/s which is far too > much bandwidth to waste on this stuff. At the moment I am left to mp3 the files > with lame -h -b32 side01.wav side01.mp3 > which does work but I would preferr to use ogg. Must I downgrade to 1.0rc2 again? > > Any insites would be apreciated. > > Regards, Kerry. > > -- > Kerry Hoath: kerry at gotss.net kerry at gotss.eu.org or kerry at gotss.spice.net.au > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
