On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 at 05:07, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 12:29 PM, Nick Desaulniers > <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 12:03 PM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:45:19AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > >> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:42 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > > I'm not digging up a compiler.h patch from a web site and adding it to > >> > > the tree this late in the release cycle. Especially given that it > >> > > hasn't had any testing anywhere... > >> > > >> > Good point about it not living in -next. > >> > > >> > Who should be carrying these sorts of patches? In the past it's been > >> > Andrew or Masahiro, yes? For linux-next, maybe it can go via -mm? > >> > >> Either is fine with me, as long as it isn't one of my trees :) > >> > >> thanks, > >> > >> greg k-h > > > > Besides, I think we want the v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/8/25/103 > > Yeah, that's what I'd linked to in the patchwork URL. Andrew, can you take this? clang built -next is blowing up now that Kees' -Wvla patch has been included. This patch fixes it. Kees, perhaps it should go in your tree along side of the -Wvla patch if no one else wants to take it? Cheers, Joel
