On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 12:03 PM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:45:19AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:42 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I'm not digging up a compiler.h patch from a web site and adding it to > > > the tree this late in the release cycle. Especially given that it > > > hasn't had any testing anywhere... > > > > Good point about it not living in -next. > > > > Who should be carrying these sorts of patches? In the past it's been > > Andrew or Masahiro, yes? For linux-next, maybe it can go via -mm? > > Either is fine with me, as long as it isn't one of my trees :) > > thanks, > > greg k-h Besides, I think we want the v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/8/25/103 -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers
