Re: [PATCH v2] compiler.h: give up __compiletime_assert_fallback()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 12:03 PM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:45:19AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:42 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > I'm not digging up a compiler.h patch from a web site and adding it to
> > > the tree this late in the release cycle.  Especially given that it
> > > hasn't had any testing anywhere...
> >
> > Good point about it not living in -next.
> >
> > Who should be carrying these sorts of patches? In the past it's been
> > Andrew or Masahiro, yes? For linux-next, maybe it can go via -mm?
>
> Either is fine with me, as long as it isn't one of my trees :)
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Besides, I think we want the v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/8/25/103
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux