On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 12:29 PM, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 12:03 PM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:45:19AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:42 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > I'm not digging up a compiler.h patch from a web site and adding it to >> > > the tree this late in the release cycle. Especially given that it >> > > hasn't had any testing anywhere... >> > >> > Good point about it not living in -next. >> > >> > Who should be carrying these sorts of patches? In the past it's been >> > Andrew or Masahiro, yes? For linux-next, maybe it can go via -mm? >> >> Either is fine with me, as long as it isn't one of my trees :) >> >> thanks, >> >> greg k-h > > Besides, I think we want the v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/8/25/103 Yeah, that's what I'd linked to in the patchwork URL. Andrew, can you take this? -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security
