Re: Sparse documentation format, rST vs MD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/07/2017 04:29 AM, Christopher Li wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:03 AM, Pavel Roskin <plroskin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>>
>>> MarkDown Pros:
>>> - More friendly to web.
> 
> So far we have 2 on MD (Josh strongly).
> You are on reStructuredText.

I prefer MD (or asciidoc :) FWIW.

> I just did a google trends comparing keyword "Markdown" and "reStructuredText"
> It seems "Markdown" is overwhelming more popular then "reStructuredText".
> 
> If I try "RST" then "RST" is slightly ahead of "Markdown", but mostly
> due to false positives. Google "RST" most result are not "reStructuredText"
> related.
> 
> I think I will go with MarkDown for now. You are right the content is the
> most important, not the format.


-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux