On 01/25/2016 12:47 PM, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 09:06:33AM -0500, Tony Camuso wrote:
...
Now, of course, one could argue that sparse should also define __int128
on platforms where gcc define it, on x86_64 thus.
...
So, I will apply the argument you so graciously supplied and posit that sparse
should define __int128 on platforms where gcc defines it, e.g. x86_64. :)
It doesn't seem like a very intrusive change.
Hehe :)
Feel like writing a patch for it?
Luc
Sure! ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
