On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 09:06:33AM -0500, Tony Camuso wrote: ... > >Now, of course, one could argue that sparse should also define __int128 > >on platforms where gcc define it, on x86_64 thus. ... > So, I will apply the argument you so graciously supplied and posit that sparse > should define __int128 on platforms where gcc defines it, e.g. x86_64. :) > > It doesn't seem like a very intrusive change. Hehe :) Feel like writing a patch for it? Luc -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
