Re: sparse error on __int128

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 09:06:33AM -0500, Tony Camuso wrote:
...

> >Now, of course, one could argue that sparse should also define __int128
> >on platforms where gcc define it, on x86_64 thus.

...

> So, I will apply the argument you so graciously supplied and posit that sparse
> should define __int128 on platforms where gcc defines it, e.g. x86_64. :)
> 
> It doesn't seem like a very intrusive change.


Hehe :)
Feel like writing a patch for it?

Luc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux