linux-sparse-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx schrieb am 21.01.2010 01:38:09: > I took another look into it. I think if you are just working on the > source code transform, > you should be able to skip the evaluation step which short cut the typedef. > > Can you try again with the same patch, but in your program, using > __sparse(filename) > instead of sparse(filename) to get the symbols? Using __sparse will skip the > evaluation step. It should keep the typedef node unchanged. Yes, that seems to help, thank you very much. I think because of the missing evaluation step, it is now a little bit more tricky to get out the elements of an struct or enum, but it will work. Do I lose anything else, skipping the evaluation step? Is it possible to commit your change ( 0001-hacking-preserve-typedef-name.patch) in source? - I didn't recognize any change in behaviour when using the function sparse(). Regards Tom -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
