On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 09:41:49PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > > Without cross function/file checking, the interrupt checking generates way > > too many false positives. > > Sounds a lot like the context checking. :) That is because the rules of the checking is too restrictive. > The use of strcmp on asm strings for x86 instruction mnemonics seems like a > problem, though. Yes, I agree. The interrupt checking is an example of how the checker can be written. It is not very usable as it is. I have a few idea to address it, but it will not help the usability issue. Cross functions checking is the way to go. Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
