On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 03:52:57PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The node is empty for now. It is needed to allow other DT snippets
> > to add thermal zone entries.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Sorry if you received this twice, lists were missing in cc in the first attempt ...
> >
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> > index 00722b533a92..968390fb0933 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> > #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h>
> > #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> > #include <dt-bindings/soc/qcom,rpmh-rsc.h>
> > +#include <dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h>
> >
> > / {
> > interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> > @@ -1087,4 +1088,7 @@
> > };
> > };
> > };
> > +
> > + thermal_zones: thermal-zones {
> > + };
>
> Others can feel free to disagree, but IMO ${SUBJECT} patch is not
> needed. Instead patch #3 in your series should just define a
> "thermal-zones" node at the root level. The "thermal-zones" node is a
> well-defined node with a well-defined node name and location (see the
> "thermal.txt" binding). If the SoC has a "thermal-zones" node and so
> does the PMIC then they'll just be merged.
Just defining it here makes perfect sense, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
