Hi,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The node is empty for now. It is needed to allow other DT snippets
> to add thermal zone entries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Sorry if you received this twice, lists were missing in cc in the first attempt ...
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> index 00722b533a92..968390fb0933 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/soc/qcom,rpmh-rsc.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h>
>
> / {
> interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> @@ -1087,4 +1088,7 @@
> };
> };
> };
> +
> + thermal_zones: thermal-zones {
> + };
Others can feel free to disagree, but IMO ${SUBJECT} patch is not
needed. Instead patch #3 in your series should just define a
"thermal-zones" node at the root level. The "thermal-zones" node is a
well-defined node with a well-defined node name and location (see the
"thermal.txt" binding). If the SoC has a "thermal-zones" node and so
does the PMIC then they'll just be merged.
-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
