Hi,
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 12:06 PM, Lina Iyer <ilina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18 2018 at 12:33 -0600, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>
>> Lina,
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Lina Iyer <ilina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +/**
>>>> * struct rsc_drv: the Direct Resource Voter (DRV) of the
>>>> * Resource State Coordinator controller (RSC)
>>>> *
>>>> @@ -52,6 +78,7 @@ struct tcs_group {
>>>> * @tcs: TCS groups
>>>> * @tcs_in_use: s/w state of the TCS
>>>> * @lock: synchronize state of the controller
>>>> + * @ctrl: controller to handle cases like batch requests
>>>
>>>
>>> This is not only for batch requests.
>>> This is handle to the DRV's client. @client might be a better name than
>>> @ctrlr.
>>
>>
>> The name "ctrlr" also matches the name of the structure. Are you
>> suggesting also renaming "struct rpmh_ctrlr" to "struct rpmh_client",
>> or you think they should be different names?
>>
> Just the name of the variable. I was just a nice to have. I wouldn't
> block for this though.
>
> I also got a couple Bot reported issues on this and the previous
> revision that I have sent to Raju. He is planning to the post the v12
> tomorrow his time after fixing them. If you can wait until then, I would
> recommend picking up the v12 instead of this.
OK, if Raju can post the v12 tomorrow his time then that sounds like a
great plan to me. While you're at it, I noticed that checkpatch
yelled about a few lines that were > 80 characters long for no good
reason. Those would be nice to fix too.
-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
