On 23/03/16 20:07, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 03/23/2016 12:47 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e96aab6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+#include "qcom-apq8064-v2.0.dtsi"
+
+/ {
+ model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. APQ8064 DragonBoard600c";
+ compatible = "qcom,apq8064-dragonboard600c", "qcom,apq8064";
Does the bootloader look at this string at all or is it using appended
DTB design? I'm mostly worried about having that
Not at least on APQ8064 bootloaders, as they are still missing DT
support. Currently we append dtb to the kernel.
qcom,apq8064-dragonboard600c part. It should probably be
qcom,apq8064-sbc or something like that instead.
Will do that in next version.
thanks,
srini
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
