On 6/4/20 12:08 PM, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote: > On 6/2/20 1:31 PM, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote: >> On 6/2/20 11:16 AM, Joseph Myers wrote: >>> On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote: >>> >>>> Also as suggested by Joseph [1] used --strip and compared the libs with >>>> and w/o patch and their sizes are exactly same (with gcc 9). >>> >>> My suggestion was to compare the *contents* of the libraries, not just >>> their sizes. Either they should be byte-for-byte identical, or if there >>> are other differences (register allocation, line numbers in assertions, >>> etc.) a more detailed investigation will be needed. >>> >> >> Here's my diff of the 2 --strip builds >> >> for i in `find . -name libm-2.31.9000.so`; do echo $i; diff $i >> /SCRATCH/vgupta/gnu2/install/glibcs/$i ; echo $?; done >> >> ./aarch64-linux-gnu/lib64/libm-2.31.9000.so >> 0 >> ./arm-linux-gnueabi/lib/libm-2.31.9000.so >> 0 >> ./x86_64-linux-gnu/lib64/libm-2.31.9000.so >> 0 >> ./arm-linux-gnueabihf/lib/libm-2.31.9000.so >> 0 >> ./riscv64-linux-gnu-rv64imac-lp64/lib64/lp64/libm-2.31.9000.so >> 0 >> ./riscv64-linux-gnu-rv64imafdc-lp64/lib64/lp64/libm-2.31.9000.so >> 0 >> ./powerpc-linux-gnu/lib/libm-2.31.9000.so >> 0 >> ./microblaze-linux-gnu/lib/libm-2.31.9000.so >> 0 >> ./nios2-linux-gnu/lib/libm-2.31.9000.so >> 0 >> ./hppa-linux-gnu/lib/libm-2.31.9000.so >> 0 >> ./s390x-linux-gnu/lib64/libm-2.31.9000.so >> 0 > > Is this sufficient for comparison ? ping ! _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
