Re: [PATCH v2] ieee754/dbl-64: Reduce the scope of temporary storage variables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:

> Also as suggested by Joseph [1] used --strip and compared the libs with
> and w/o patch and their sizes are exactly same (with gcc 9).

My suggestion was to compare the *contents* of the libraries, not just 
their sizes.  Either they should be byte-for-byte identical, or if there 
are other differences (register allocation, line numbers in assertions, 
etc.) a more detailed investigation will be needed.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux