On 6/2/20 11:16 AM, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote: > >> Also as suggested by Joseph [1] used --strip and compared the libs with >> and w/o patch and their sizes are exactly same (with gcc 9). > > My suggestion was to compare the *contents* of the libraries, not just > their sizes. Either they should be byte-for-byte identical, or if there > are other differences (register allocation, line numbers in assertions, > etc.) a more detailed investigation will be needed. > Here's my diff of the 2 --strip builds for i in `find . -name libm-2.31.9000.so`; do echo $i; diff $i /SCRATCH/vgupta/gnu2/install/glibcs/$i ; echo $?; done ./aarch64-linux-gnu/lib64/libm-2.31.9000.so 0 ./arm-linux-gnueabi/lib/libm-2.31.9000.so 0 ./x86_64-linux-gnu/lib64/libm-2.31.9000.so 0 ./arm-linux-gnueabihf/lib/libm-2.31.9000.so 0 ./riscv64-linux-gnu-rv64imac-lp64/lib64/lp64/libm-2.31.9000.so 0 ./riscv64-linux-gnu-rv64imafdc-lp64/lib64/lp64/libm-2.31.9000.so 0 ./powerpc-linux-gnu/lib/libm-2.31.9000.so 0 ./microblaze-linux-gnu/lib/libm-2.31.9000.so 0 ./nios2-linux-gnu/lib/libm-2.31.9000.so 0 ./hppa-linux-gnu/lib/libm-2.31.9000.so 0 ./s390x-linux-gnu/lib64/libm-2.31.9000.so 0 _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
