On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:47:22 +0100 Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > At the moment, I am in favor of this patchset. It is huge and > needed a lot of manual work. But the result is straightforward and > easy to understand. I'm in favor of this patchset too. If there's other areas that need to adjust the current loglevel (say per task context), then we can cross that bridge when the need arises. But I don't want to over engineer this as the stack trace logic should have a way to explicitly state how important this stack trace really is (or better yet, we should be removing stack traces that are not important!) -- Steve _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
