On Tue 2019-11-12 13:57:04, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (19/11/12 13:44), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > [..] > > > But yes, this per-code-section loglevel is problematic. The feedback > > > against the patchset shows that people want it also the other way. > > > I mean to keep pr_debug() as pr_debug(). > > > > Hmm. Right. > > > > > A solution might be to use the per-code-section loglevel only instead > > > of some special loglevel. > > > > So maybe we can "overwrite" only KERN_DEFAULT loglevels? > > LOGLEVEL_DEFAULT, LOGLEVEL_NOTICE, LOGLEVEL_INFO? > > So we can downgrade some messages (log_store() only) or promote > some messages. > > DEBUG perhaps should stay debug. > > > We certainly should not mess with SCHED or with anything in between > > EMERG and ERR. > > [EMERG, WARN] This is getting too complicated. It would introduce too many hidden rules. While the explicitly passed loglevel parameter is straightforward and clear. I am getting more inclined to the solution introduced by this patchset. It looks reasonable for the different use-cases. Best Regards, Petr _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
