Re: [PATCH 00/50] Add log level to show_stack()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Tue 2019-11-12 13:57:04, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (19/11/12 13:44), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> [..]
> > > But yes, this per-code-section loglevel is problematic. The feedback
> > > against the patchset shows that people want it also the other way.
> > > I mean to keep pr_debug() as pr_debug().
> > 
> > Hmm. Right.
> > 
> > > A solution might be to use the per-code-section loglevel only instead
> > > of some special loglevel.
> > 
> > So maybe we can "overwrite" only KERN_DEFAULT loglevels?
> So we can downgrade some messages (log_store() only) or promote
> some messages.
> DEBUG perhaps should stay debug.
> > We certainly should not mess with SCHED or with anything in between
> > EMERG and ERR.

This is getting too complicated. It would introduce too many
hidden rules. While the explicitly passed loglevel parameter
is straightforward and clear.

I am getting more inclined to the solution introduced by this
patchset. It looks reasonable for the different use-cases.

Best Regards,

linux-snps-arc mailing list

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux