On (19/11/12 19:12), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (19/11/12 09:35), Petr Mladek wrote: > [..] > > This is getting too complicated. It would introduce too many > > hidden rules. While the explicitly passed loglevel parameter > > is straightforward and clear. > > If loglevel is DEFAULT or NOTICE or INFO then we can overwrite it > (either downgrade or upgrade). That's one rule, basically. Not too > complicated, I guess. Can be taken even a bit further than show_stack(NULL, NULL, LOGLEVEL_DEBUG); or show_stack(NULL, NULL, LOGLEVEL_ERR); For instance, spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags); printk_emergency_enter(LOGLEVEL_SCHED); ... show_stack(...); printk(); printk(); ... spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags); or spin_lock_irqsave(&uart_port->lock, flags); printk_emergency_enter(LOGLEVEL_SCHED); ... printk(); printk(); ... and so on. -ss _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
