Hi Daniel, On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 17:09 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 03:01:03PM +0000, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > >? > > > Ok I went ahead and pushed a slight revised version of that patch which > > > just unconditionally sends out the event. That's not correct, but at least > > > that way the nonblocking changes won't totally break arcpgu and I can move > > > ahead with those. > > Thanks for that. > > In the meantime I tried previously sent patches: > > --------------->8------------- > > 9267484 drm/arc: Actually bother with handling atomic events. > > cf4a489 drm/arc: Nuke event_list > > 9c3152e drm/atomic-helper: Massage swap_state signature somewhat > > --------------->8------------- > > and on both boards (axs103 and nSIM OSCI) video works quite fine. > > The possible breakage only starts when you move further into the series, > up to patch 10. That implements generic nonblocking commit, but that > support relies upon crtc_state->event being signalled. Anyway I'm pulling > it all into drm-misc now, so you can just test that branch (or linux-next > when it's rebuild next week). Ok thanks anyways. I'll try linux-next once it gets updated with your changes. -Alexey
