Hi Daniel, On Thu, 2016-06-09 at 15:52 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >? > The fake implementation is fundamentally racy, and I don't want to write > helpers which can't be used correctly. Anyway I think without this patch > (or something similar) arcpgu will stall badly with the new nonblocking > helpers, because arcpgu didn't bother at all to implement nonblocking. Can > you pls ack this, or even better, test the entire patch series? The > helpers themselves should work, but in all 5 drivers tested thus far they > discovered some bugs. Sure I will happily test this series. The only question then is what should I use as a proper base? -Alexey
