On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin at synopsys.com> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Thu, 2016-06-09 at 15:52 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> >> The fake implementation is fundamentally racy, and I don't want to write >> helpers which can't be used correctly. Anyway I think without this patch >> (or something similar) arcpgu will stall badly with the new nonblocking >> helpers, because arcpgu didn't bother at all to implement nonblocking. Can >> you pls ack this, or even better, test the entire patch series? The >> helpers themselves should work, but in all 5 drivers tested thus far they >> discovered some bugs. > > Sure I will happily test this series. > The only question then is what should I use as a proper base? It should apply on drm-next from Dave. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
