On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 12:02 PM Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 16. 01. 25, 10:53, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 10:42:14AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > >> This is threaded weirdly. > > > > Yeah, new patch (version) — new email thread. > > > >> On 16. 01. 25, 10:32, Andre Werner wrote: > >>> Fix the IRQ check to treat the negative values as No IRQ. > >> > >> Care to describe on what HW that can happen? > > > > But how does this relevant? The whole idea is that neither I²C nor SPI > > frameworks do not guarantee the IRQ field never be negative. This is > > the fix to the previously submitted patch. > > They do AFAICS. Could you be more specific? Hmm... I have looked into the SPI core and this behaviour seems quite new. Documentation still says the same as before where it's not guaranteed. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
