Re: [External Email] Re: [PATCH v1] serial: sc16is7xx: Extend IRQ check for negative valus

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 11:01:30AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 16. 01. 25, 10:52, Andre Werner wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Jan 2025, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > > On 16. 01. 25, 10:32, Andre Werner wrote:
> > > > Fix the IRQ check to treat the negative values as No IRQ.
> > > 
> > > Care to describe on what HW that can happen?
> > 
> > I have no example on that. In the previous thread it was mentioned that
> > it is not absolutely sure that the API is not called with negative values. Thus,
> > negative values shall also be treated as no IRQ.
> 
> SPI:
>         if (spi->irq < 0)
>                 spi->irq = 0;

In all cases of how SPI target device is instantiated? I haven't checked myself
all those (three or four? or even five?) ways.

> I2C:
>                 if (irq < 0)
>                         irq = 0;

> So unlikely :).

Yes, but none of them _guarantees_ that (looking at the documentation and
the field type in the respective data structures).

Until there no guarantees, I would consider this patch as robustness increase.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko






[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux