Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] serial: sc16is7xx: hardware reset chip if reset-gpios is defined in DT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 6/18/24 00:03, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 18:29:52 +0800
Hui Wang <hui.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Hui,

Some boards connect a GPIO to the reset pin, and the reset pin needs
...
+	struct gpio_desc *reset_gpio;
+
+	/*
+	 * The reset input is active low, and flag GPIOD_OUT_HIGH ensures the
+	 * GPIO is low once devm_gpiod_get_optional returns a valid gpio_desc.
+	 */
I would replace all the above comments with:

   /* Assert reset GPIO if defined and valid. */

The correct polarity is already defined by the device
tree reset-gpios entry, and can be high or low depending on the design
(ex: there can be an inverter between the CPU and the chip reset input,
etc).

Agree with that, I will change it in the v6.
+	reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
+	if (IS_ERR(reset_gpio))
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(reset_gpio), "Failed to get reset GPIO\n");
+
...
+out_kthread:
  	kthread_stop(s->kworker_task);
out_clk:
--
2.34.1

I could not test the validity of the 3us delay since I do not have an
oscilloscope, but testing with a 10s delay instead and a
multimeter showed that it works ok. You can add my Tested-by tag:

Tested-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

And if you modify the comment as I suggested above, then you can add my
R-b tag:

Reviewed-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
OK. thanks.





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux