On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 12:08:40PM -0400, Parker Newman wrote: > On Thu, 2 May 2024 19:01:01 +0300 > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 11:46:45AM -0400, Parker Newman wrote: > > > On Thu, 2 May 2024 17:43:54 +0300 > > > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > After a rework for CONNTECH was done, the driver may need a bit of > > > > love in order to become less verbose (in terms of indentation and > > > > code duplication) and hence easier to read. > > > > > > > > This clean up series fixes a couple of (not so critical) issues and > > > > cleans up the recently added code. No functional change indented by > > > > the cleaning up part. > > > > > > Just an FYI I submitted a patch series that fixed several of these issues but I > > > think it fell through the cracks (I know everyone is very busy!). > > > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-serial/cover.1713533298.git.pnewman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > I believe my previous patch series is no longer required. This one fixes > > > everything. > > > > I haven't noticed that, if it contains duplicated patches, I may replace mine > > with yours if you insist. > > > > In any case it's better to reply there that you prefer this series to be > > applied, so Greg will not pick it up. > > > > I do not have a preference. I am fine with using yours if it is easier on > the maintainers. Up to you, there is no issue to take your patches in case they are the same (or quite similar) as mine. I can pick them up, just tell me if you want this to happen with a list of the patches (as mail Message-Id). > I will send a reply on my previous series that it is not needed and link > to this. I am new to the mailing lists so I didn't know what the procedure > is for this situation. It's not about mailing lists, it's just a common sense. > Thanks for the fixes :), You are welcome! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
