On 22. 02. 24, 14:21, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 07:58:32AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 21. 02. 24, 19:31, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
unsigned char iotype; /* io access style */
+#define UPIO_UNSET ((unsigned char)~0U) /* UCHAR_MAX */
Perhaps making the var u8 and this U8_MAX then? It would make more sense to
me.
WFM, should it be a separate change?
Likely.
Btw, how can I justify it?
Hmm, thinking about it, why is it not an enum?
But it could be also an u8 because you want it be exactly 8 bits as you
want to be sure values up to 255 fit.
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
