On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 10:24:38AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Since commit 1f2bcb8c8ccd ("gpio: protect the descriptor label with
> SRCU") gpiod_set_consumer_name() calls synchronize_srcu() which led to
> a "sleeping in atomic context" smatch warning.
>
> This function (along with gpiod_get/put() and all other GPIO APIs apart
> from gpiod_get/set_value() and gpiod_direction_input/output()) should
> have never been called with a spinlock taken. We're only fixing this now
> as GPIOLIB has been rebuilt to use SRCU for access serialization which
> uncovered this problem.
>
> Move the calls to gpiod_get/put() outside the spinlock critical section.
>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/deee1438-efc1-47c4-8d80-0ab2cf01d60a@moroto.mountain/
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c b/drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c
> index bbb5595d7e24..52a20277df98 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c
> @@ -467,6 +467,7 @@ static void asc_set_termios(struct uart_port *port, struct ktermios *termios,
> struct asc_port *ascport = to_asc_port(port);
> struct gpio_desc *gpiod;
> unsigned int baud;
> + bool manual_rts;
> u32 ctrl_val;
> tcflag_t cflag;
> unsigned long flags;
> @@ -517,26 +518,12 @@ static void asc_set_termios(struct uart_port *port, struct ktermios *termios,
> ctrl_val |= ASC_CTL_CTSENABLE;
>
> /* If flow-control selected, stop handling RTS manually */
> - if (ascport->rts) {
> - devm_gpiod_put(port->dev, ascport->rts);
> - ascport->rts = NULL;
> -
> - pinctrl_select_state(ascport->pinctrl,
> - ascport->states[DEFAULT]);
> - }
> + if (ascport->rts)
> + manual_rts = false;
> } else {
> /* If flow-control disabled, it's safe to handle RTS manually */
> - if (!ascport->rts && ascport->states[NO_HW_FLOWCTRL]) {
> - pinctrl_select_state(ascport->pinctrl,
> - ascport->states[NO_HW_FLOWCTRL]);
> -
> - gpiod = devm_gpiod_get(port->dev, "rts", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> - if (!IS_ERR(gpiod)) {
> - gpiod_set_consumer_name(gpiod,
> - port->dev->of_node->name);
> - ascport->rts = gpiod;
> - }
> - }
> + if (!ascport->rts && ascport->states[NO_HW_FLOWCTRL])
> + manual_rts = true;
> }
>
> if ((baud < 19200) && !ascport->force_m1) {
> @@ -595,6 +582,23 @@ static void asc_set_termios(struct uart_port *port, struct ktermios *termios,
> asc_out(port, ASC_CTL, (ctrl_val | ASC_CTL_RUN));
>
> uart_port_unlock_irqrestore(port, flags);
> +
> + if (manual_rts) {
> + pinctrl_select_state(ascport->pinctrl,
> + ascport->states[NO_HW_FLOWCTRL]);
> +
> + gpiod = devm_gpiod_get(port->dev, "rts", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> + if (!IS_ERR(gpiod)) {
> + gpiod_set_consumer_name(gpiod,
> + port->dev->of_node->name);
> + ascport->rts = gpiod;
> + } else {
> + devm_gpiod_put(port->dev, ascport->rts);
> + ascport->rts = NULL;
> + pinctrl_select_state(ascport->pinctrl,
> + ascport->states[DEFAULT]);
> + }
> + }
> }
The 0-day bot rightly points out that manual_rts could be uninitialized
by this change, so I'm dropping it from my tree. Please fix up and
resend.
thanks,
greg k-h
