[Cc += dt maintainers] On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 07:50:36PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > IMHO PATCHv4 was better, but in the end I don't have strong feelings > about this. Btw. I think this patchset is a good demonstration of > frustrating upstream kernel development can be considering PATCHv5 > is basically the same as PATCHv1. Thanks for making us go in > circles :( I still like v4 better than v1/v5. I'm sorry for the frustration this created on your side. I'd ask Greg to reconsider given that dt is less flexible than a sysfs knob and otherwise shares all downsides of sysfs (people don't want to have to tune that, so a useful default for most cases is important; you have to consult documentation to understand how to tune it). Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
