On 21.11.2023 23:38, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 21/11/2023 13:13, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thank you for your patch. There is something to discuss/improve.
+
+properties:
+ compatible:
+ const: brcm,bcm63138-hs-uart
+
+ reg:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+ interrupts:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+required:
Missing compatible.
I stopped putting "compatible" in "required" in schemas back in 2020 :O
Back then I received a comment from Rob [0] in discussion on
[PATCH] dt-bindings: mtd: convert "fixed-partitions" to the json-schema
telling to drop it:
On 10.12.2020 03:48, Rob Herring wrote:
> And drop 'compatible' as required. It's redundant anyways because the
> schema will only be applied if compatible matches.
So I'll need some help here please. Should I start including
"compatible" in "required" after all? Or is that situation specific
(could you explain what does it depend on)?
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20201210024840.GA1510718@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
