On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 11:16 PM Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 18. 11. 23, 4:38, Anup Patel wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_riscv_sbi.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_riscv_sbi.c
> > index 31f53fa77e4a..697c981221b5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_riscv_sbi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_riscv_sbi.c
> ...
> > -static int __init hvc_sbi_console_init(void)
> > +static int hvc_sbi_dbcn_tty_get(uint32_t vtermno, char *buf, int count)
> > {
> > - hvc_instantiate(0, 0, &hvc_sbi_ops);
> > + phys_addr_t pa;
> > +
> > + if (is_vmalloc_addr(buf)) {
>
> I wonder, where does this buf come from, so that you have to check for
> vmalloc?
>
When VMAP_STCK is enabled, stack allocation depends on the vmalloc.
That's why we have to if the buf is allocated using vmalloc.
> > + pa = page_to_phys(vmalloc_to_page(buf)) + offset_in_page(buf);
> > + if (PAGE_SIZE < (offset_in_page(buf) + count))
>
> Am I the only one who would prefer:
> if (count + offset_in_page(buf) > PAGE_SIZE)
> ?
>
> > + count = PAGE_SIZE - offset_in_page(buf);
> > + } else {
> > + pa = __pa(buf);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return sbi_debug_console_read(count, pa);
> > +}
>
>
> thanks,
> --
> js
> suse labs
>
