[PATCH 14/15] tty: don't check for signal_pending() in send_break()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



msleep_interruptible() will check on its own. So no need to do the check
in send_break() before calling the above.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
index 87bb5094e0bb..24833b31b81c 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
@@ -2484,8 +2484,7 @@ static int send_break(struct tty_struct *tty, unsigned int duration)
 	retval = tty->ops->break_ctl(tty, -1);
 	if (retval)
 		goto out;
-	if (!signal_pending(current))
-		msleep_interruptible(duration);
+	msleep_interruptible(duration);
 	retval = tty->ops->break_ctl(tty, 0);
 out:
 	tty_write_unlock(tty);
-- 
2.42.0




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux