Currently, n_tty handles the newline in a label in n_tty_receive_char_canon(). That is invoked from two more places. Split this code to a separate function and avoid the label in this case. This makes the code flow more understandable. Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/tty/n_tty.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c index 0149dc9dd0b1..632516d7b487 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c +++ b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c @@ -1262,6 +1262,17 @@ static bool n_tty_receive_char_flow_ctrl(struct tty_struct *tty, unsigned char c return true; } +static void n_tty_receive_handle_newline(struct tty_struct *tty, u8 c) +{ + struct n_tty_data *ldata = tty->disc_data; + + set_bit(MASK(ldata->read_head), ldata->read_flags); + put_tty_queue(c, ldata); + smp_store_release(&ldata->canon_head, ldata->read_head); + kill_fasync(&tty->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN); + wake_up_interruptible_poll(&tty->read_wait, EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM); +} + static bool n_tty_receive_char_canon(struct tty_struct *tty, u8 c) { struct n_tty_data *ldata = tty->disc_data; @@ -1308,12 +1319,16 @@ static bool n_tty_receive_char_canon(struct tty_struct *tty, u8 c) echo_char_raw('\n', ldata); commit_echoes(tty); } - goto handle_newline; + n_tty_receive_handle_newline(tty, c); + + return true; } if (c == EOF_CHAR(tty)) { c = __DISABLED_CHAR; - goto handle_newline; + n_tty_receive_handle_newline(tty, c); + + return true; } if ((c == EOL_CHAR(tty)) || @@ -1335,12 +1350,8 @@ static bool n_tty_receive_char_canon(struct tty_struct *tty, u8 c) if (c == (unsigned char) '\377' && I_PARMRK(tty)) put_tty_queue(c, ldata); -handle_newline: - set_bit(MASK(ldata->read_head), ldata->read_flags); - put_tty_queue(c, ldata); - smp_store_release(&ldata->canon_head, ldata->read_head); - kill_fasync(&tty->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN); - wake_up_interruptible_poll(&tty->read_wait, EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM); + n_tty_receive_handle_newline(tty, c); + return true; } -- 2.42.0