On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 04:51:06AM +0000, Starke, Daniel wrote: > > Please no, procfs is NOT for driver/device statistics like this, that's > > what sysfs is for if you really need/want it. > > > > What userspace tool is going to read/parse this thing? Where does it > > live? > > > > And what about the security issues involved with all of this new data > > that you are now exposing to all users? Has it been audited to verify > > that it is safe to do so? > > Thank you for the feedback and patience. I understand your concerns. > Therefore, please proceed with this patch series by excluding this > patch #9. Please let me know if you need me to resend the patch series. You have to resend them, they are long gone from my review queue, and picking out an individual patch to not apply is difficult with our existing tools as that is not a normal workflow. thanks, greg k-h
