> Please no, procfs is NOT for driver/device statistics like this, that's > what sysfs is for if you really need/want it. > > What userspace tool is going to read/parse this thing? Where does it > live? > > And what about the security issues involved with all of this new data > that you are now exposing to all users? Has it been audited to verify > that it is safe to do so? Thank you for the feedback and patience. I understand your concerns. Therefore, please proceed with this patch series by excluding this patch #9. Please let me know if you need me to resend the patch series. Best regards, Daniel Starke
