On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 10:17:22 -0400 Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 15:07:50 +0200 > Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 10:05:51AM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > > > From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Add comments about workaround used to configure membase address. This > > > follows suggestions made during review of a sc16is7xx driver patch to > > > add the same workaround. > > > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2936e18f-44ea-faed-9fa0-2ddefe7c3194@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230801131655.80bd8f97f018dda6155d65f6@xxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c | 5 +++++ > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c b/drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c > > > index 416d553b73a7..5903dd033fd0 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c > > > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c > > > @@ -1369,6 +1369,11 @@ static int max310x_probe(struct device *dev, const struct max310x_devtype *devty > > > s->p[i].port.flags = UPF_FIXED_TYPE | UPF_LOW_LATENCY; > > > s->p[i].port.iotype = UPIO_PORT; > > > s->p[i].port.iobase = i; > > > + /* > > > + * Use all ones as membase to make sure uart_configure_port() in > > > + * serial_core.c does not abort for SPI/I2C devices where the > > > + * membase address is not applicable. > > > + */ > > > s->p[i].port.membase = (void __iomem *)~0; > > > s->p[i].port.uartclk = uartclk; > > > s->p[i].port.rs485_config = max310x_rs485_config; > > > > > > base-commit: 426263d5fb400ccde5444748693dc75bda18f01e > > > -- > > > 2.30.2 > > > > > > > Meta-comment, your email system is not correct and is not able to be > > verified as I get the following when attempting to apply your patch: > > > > --- > > ✗ [PATCH] serial: max310x: add comments for membase address workaround > > --- > > ✗ BADSIG: DKIM/hugovil.com > > > > Please fix up for future submissions. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > Hi Greg, > I will look into it. Thank you. Hi Greg, I double-checked my DKIM setup, but everything looks fine. If I send emails to gmail or outlook servers, they both report "DKIM signature=pass", and I also checked with an online DKIM validation service and it is also ok. What tool are you using to check the DKIM signature? Thank you, Hugo.
