RE: [PATCH 6/9] tty: n_gsm: increase malformed counter for malformed control frames

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > +		dlci->gsm->malformed++;
> >  		return;
> > +	}
> 
> Should this change have a Fixes: tag? Or is ->malformed just an internal 
> variable which is not exposed anywhere (in which case state that in the 
> changelog)?

Correct, the variable is not yet exposed anywhere. I will add a remark for
this in the changelog.

Best regards,
Daniel Starke




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux