On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 09:06:43AM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] tty: serial: sh-sci: Fix Rx on RZ/G2L SCI
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:32:38AM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> > > Hi Geert,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the feedback.
> > >
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] tty: serial: sh-sci: Fix Rx on RZ/G2L
> > > > SCI
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 12:48 PM Biju Das
> > > > <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > SCI IP on RZ/G2L alike SoCs do not need regshift compared to other
> > > > > SCI IPs on the SH platform. Currently, it does regshift and
> > > > > configuring Rx wrongly. Drop adding regshift for RZ/G2L alike SoCs.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: dfc80387aefb ("serial: sh-sci: Compute the regshift value
> > > > > for SCI ports")
> > > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > v3->v4:
> > > > > * Updated the fixes tag
> > > > > * Replaced sci_port->is_rz_sci with dev->dev.of_node as regshift
> > > > > are only
> > > > needed
> > > > > for sh770x/sh7750/sh7760, which don't use DT yet.
> > > > > * Dropped is_rz_sci variable from struct sci_port.
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > One can wonder how this ever worked on DT-based H8/300...
> > >
> > > Yep, it is interesting to see whether SCI ever worked on DT-based
> > > H8/300 Assuming it has same register layout as RZ/G2L SoC.
> >
> > This is already in Linus's tree now, right?
>
> As per the discussion with Geert, It is been removed since 2022. Yes, It is present in backports.
>
> Geert, please correct me If I am wrong.
Seems to not apply against 6.3-rc3 :(
