On 3/2/2023 9:20 AM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 9:01 AM Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Saravana,
Am 02.03.23 um 03:35 schrieb Saravana Kannan:
This allow fw_devlink to do dependency tracking for serdev devices.
Reported-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/03b70a8a-0591-f28b-a567-9d2f736f17e5@xxxxxxxxx/
Cc: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx>
since this fixes an issue on Raspberry Pi 4, shouldn't this be mentioned
in the commit message and providing a Fixes tag?
So RPi 4 was never creating a device links between serdev devices and
their consumers. The error message was just a new one I added and we
are noticing and catching the fact that serdev wasn't setting fwnode
for a device.
I'm also not sure if I can say this commit "Fixes" an issue in serdev
core because when serdev core was written, fw_devlink wasn't a thing.
Once I add Fixes, people will start pulling this into stable
branches/other trees where I don't think this should be pulled into
older stable branches.
That is kind of the point of Fixes: tag, is not it? It is appropriate to
list a commit that is not specific to serdev, but maybe a particular
point into the fw_devlink history. Given this did not appear to have a
functional impact, we could go without one.
--
Florian
