On 28.09.2022 18:23, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, Sergiu.Moga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> On 28.09.2022 18:03, Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2022, Sergiu Moga wrote: >>> >>>> Another functionality of FLEXCOM is that of SPI. In order for >>>> the proper validation of the SPI children nodes through the binding >>>> to occur, the proper binding for SPI must be referenced. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Moga <sergiu.moga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> >>>> >>>> v1 -> v2: >>>> - use full schema paths >>>> >>>> >>>> v2 -> v3: >>>> - Added Reviewed-by tag, previously this was [PATCH 3] >>>> >>>> >>>> v3 -> v4: >>>> - Nothing, previously this was [PATCH 5] >>>> >>>> >>>> v4 -> v5: >>>> - Nothing >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,sama5d2-flexcom.yaml | 5 ++--- >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> Not sure how these can be handled. >>> >>> I guess I cannot take these until the other patches are applied. >>> >>> NB: The patch doesn't apply cleanly anyway, so will need to be rebased. >>> >> >> >> Hello, >> >> The sama5d2-flexcom binding related patches are dependent on: >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220916075744.1879428-1-kavyasree.kotagiri@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > I would be very cautious about relying on comments made in the > cover-letter. Better to make this a hard requirement and place them > in the same patch-set. > > -- > Lee Jones [李琼斯] Understood, my apologies, I will keep this in mind the next time this happens :). Otherwise, by applying the patch series linked above, my sama5d2-flexcom patches should apply cleanly afterwards. Thanks, Sergiu
