On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, Sergiu.Moga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On 28.09.2022 18:03, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Sep 2022, Sergiu Moga wrote: > > > >> Another functionality of FLEXCOM is that of SPI. In order for > >> the proper validation of the SPI children nodes through the binding > >> to occur, the proper binding for SPI must be referenced. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Moga <sergiu.moga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> > >> > >> v1 -> v2: > >> - use full schema paths > >> > >> > >> v2 -> v3: > >> - Added Reviewed-by tag, previously this was [PATCH 3] > >> > >> > >> v3 -> v4: > >> - Nothing, previously this was [PATCH 5] > >> > >> > >> v4 -> v5: > >> - Nothing > >> > >> > >> > >> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,sama5d2-flexcom.yaml | 5 ++--- > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > Not sure how these can be handled. > > > > I guess I cannot take these until the other patches are applied. > > > > NB: The patch doesn't apply cleanly anyway, so will need to be rebased. > > > > > Hello, > > The sama5d2-flexcom binding related patches are dependent on: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220916075744.1879428-1-kavyasree.kotagiri@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ I would be very cautious about relying on comments made in the cover-letter. Better to make this a hard requirement and place them in the same patch-set. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
