On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 01:37:13AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > 1) Add a new capability like UART_CAP_NO16DIV and take it into account > in the serial8250_get_baud_rate() method. > > I don't have a documentation for the Mediatek UART port, but it seems to me > that that controller calculates the baud rate differently from the standard > 8250 port. A standard 8250 port does that by the next formulae: > baud = uartclk / (16 * divisor). > While it seems to me that the Mediatek port uses the formulae like: > baud = uartclk / divisor. (Please, correct me if I'm wrong) 8250_bcm2835aux.c seems to suffer from a similar issue and solves it like this in the ->probe hook: /* the HW-clock divider for bcm2835aux is 8, * but 8250 expects a divider of 16, * so we have to multiply the actual clock by 2 * to get identical baudrates. */ up.port.uartclk = clk_get_rate(data->clk) * 2; > 2) Manually call serial8250_do_set_divisor() in the custom set_termios() > callback. > > Just add the uart_update_timeout() and serial8250_do_set_divisor() methods > invocation into the mtk8250_set_termios() function, which the original commit > 81bb549fdf14 ("serial: 8250_mtk: support big baud rate") author should have > done in the first place. That sound preferable as adding new quirks into core code feels like a case of midlayer fallacy: https://blog.ffwll.ch/2016/12/midlayers-once-more-with-feeling.html Thanks, Lukas