Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] tty: serial: qcom_geni_serial: IRQ cleanup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 10/16/2019 1:41 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Akash Asthana (2019-10-11 00:39:06)
On 10/10/2019 7:49 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Akash Asthana (2019-10-10 02:46:03)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c
index 14c6306..5180cd8 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c
@@ -1297,11 +1291,21 @@ static int qcom_geni_serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
          port->rx_fifo_depth = DEF_FIFO_DEPTH_WORDS;
          port->tx_fifo_width = DEF_FIFO_WIDTH_BITS;
+ scnprintf(port->name, sizeof(port->name), "qcom_geni_serial_%s%d",
+               (uart_console(uport) ? "console" : "uart"), uport->line);
Drop useless parenthesis. Also, it might make more sense to make this a
devm_kasprintf() call now.
OK

          irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
          if (irq < 0)
                  return irq;
          uport->irq = irq;
+ irq_set_status_flags(uport->irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
Is there a reason why we can't always leave the irq enabled and request
it later once the uart structure has been fully initialized?
According to current design we are requesting IRQ handler in probe, and
we enable and disable it from the startup(port open) and shutdown(port
close) function respectively.

We need to call for disable_irq in shutdown function because client has
closed the port and we don't expect any transfer requests after it.

request it later once the uart structure has been fully initialized?
      Is the ask is to move request irq later in probe after the uport is
fully initialized?
Yes I'm wondering if we can get rid of the IRQ_NOAUTOEN and
irq_enable/disable bits in here and leave the interrupt enabled all the
time.

Ideally it should work, I will run few experiments to make sure there isn't any spurious interrupts problem after port close is called.

If it works, I will post a separate patch for it.

--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,\na Linux Foundation Collaborative Project




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux