Re: [RFC v2 00/11] DVFS in the OPP core

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 5/21/2019 11:52 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 20-03-19, 15:19, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
This is a v2 of the RFC posted earlier by Stephen Boyd [1]

As part of v2 I still follow the same approach of dev_pm_opp_set_rate()
API using clk framework to round the frequency passed and making it
accept 0 as a valid frequency indicating the frequency isn't required
anymore. It just has a few more drivers converted to use this approach
like dsi/dpu and ufs.
ufs demonstrates the case of having to handle multiple power domains, one
of which is scalable.

The patches are based on 5.1-rc1 and depend on some ufs fixes I posted
earlier [2] and a DT patch to include the rpmpd header [3]

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/1/28/2086
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/8/70
[3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/20/120

Hi Rajendra,

I am inclined to apply/push this series for 5.3-rc1, will it be
possible for you to spend some time on this at priority ?

Hey Viresh, I was on vacation, just got back. I will refresh this series
and address your previous feedback, I haven't received much feedback for the
driver changes :/ but we can atleast review and get the OPP layer changes
finalized. thanks.

--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux